Supported by
Supported by Inetum

In Eclipse the compiler is not lazy

images/thumbnail.jpg - Thumbnail

Still using SAPGUI instead of Eclipse ADT? Get ready to be made fun of.

In this new series of articles, I’m going to give you, dear reader, a set of reasons why I consider myself entitled to make fun of you and badmouth you to others if you still use SAPGUI and SE80 and SE24 instead of the Eclipse ADT.

I don’t even like Eclipse very much. I’m more of a Visual Studio Code fan. But Eclipse is still 10x better than SAPGUI. And I’ll try to show you why.

In SAPGUI

When you’re writing code, the compiler is asleep. It only wakes up when you save, activate or check the code. And then what happens is unfortunate: probably because it’s sleepy, it stops as soon as it encounters the first error. As long as you haven’t corrected that first error, the compiler won’t report any more. If your code has 50 errors, you won’t get out until you’ve tried to activate it 50 times, correcting one error at a time. So sad it hurts.

Also, for some very strange reason, it only shows the warnings if there is at least one error in the code. If there are no errors, it doesn’t show warnings even if the code is full of them. Why is that? I don’t know. But it’s very silly.

In Eclipse ADT

The compiler is always working. It’s tireless. While you’re programming, all errors and warnings are discreetly marked on the relevant line. These signals are constantly being updated. Just hover your mouse over one of them to see a description of the problem. Alternatively, you can open the Problems window to see a list of them all. As you fix them, they will disappear. If there aren’t any, you know you’ve successfully activated the code. Simple. Now that makes sense.

Conclusion

So, if you’re still using SAPGUI and you could be using Eclipse ADT, you’re not the sharpest tool in the shed, are you?

Greetings from Abapinho.