If the same piece of code is repeated at least once, question yourself why and try to avoid it by creating a reusable routine. If there is more than one SELECT for the same table in a program, make sure you can’t merge them into a single one. Sometimes a smart use of RANGEs to unify parameters can avoid the need for multiple SELECTs. If the same code is used in 2 different programs, don’t repeat the code.

The more global variables a program has, the most obscure it becomes. Please avoid them. This is a basic rule of good programming and should always be followed. Even if several variables have to be passed by parameter, it takes slightly more effort but yields a much more readable and safer code. Exceptions can be made for simple reports which run around a single internal table, which can be declared globally without compromising clarity.

Long ago, you used the expression “groovy, man”. Later came “great, man”. Then there was “cool”. Today you say “awesome”. It’s important not to get confused and not make a fool of yourself.

And how do you ask an internal table if a line exists exists?

There are standard functions that trigger messages where they shouldn’t. And they shouldn’t because we want to use these functions in non-interactive programs and then, instead of returning the error, an error message is triggered and ruins the whole process.

However, being aware of this problem, SAP has provided a quite elegant (but not well documented) way of solving this problem.

SAP doesn’t know how to do things right the first time. The WebDynpros are a good example of this. It doesn’t even let you do a text search. It’s sad.

Fortunately Sérgio Fraga has found a way, though it’s rather laboured:

I’m 6 years old! (Thank you Caleb Prichard for the photo)

It is common to find an ALV data structure explicitly defined in the code. If this is done, the field catalog has to be manually constructed. If a predefined structure (from DDIC or declared as a TYPE) is used instead, the field catalog can be automatically built. This approach is always better and results in less code, even if the field catalog needs to be adjusted here and there. https://abapinho.com/en/2011/12/automatizar-catalogo-alv/

Many times we do READ TABLE itbl or LOOP AT itbl just to do a CHECK SY-SUBRC = 0. In these cases, the actual data read is not needed. For these cases always use TRANSPORTING NO FIELDS. This way is faster and avoids having to declare a target structure.

Imagine you have a program executing an infinite cycle or, at least, a cycle with 70x7 iterations. It is neverending, and you want to know what’s going on there.

In the past you had to go to SM50, select the process and choose from the menu “Administration | Program | Debug”.

But now there is a much easier way.

No matter how many times things go around in ABAP, everything ends up in SE38. Even the methods of the ABAP classes are saved in includes.

Sometimes, when there is a dump, it says the problem is, for example, here: CL_MESSAGE_HELPER=============CM001.

You’ve released a transport order because you thought everything was ready. However, one more minor modification was still missing. So now you will have to create a new order and transport both of them. What a drag.

Don’t worry.

Do you know about the EGSAP_TECH app? It’s a SAP knowledge bank.

Here is a description in the words of its own creators:

Abapinho received a letter.

Mr. Abapinho,

Everybody knows how to set default values in select options using the DEFAULT keyword. What some people may not know is that one can also set the default option, sign and even if allows for intervals or just fixed values.

Today I will teach you how to chain exceptions. It’s a very practical solution to a complicated, not so obvious problem. Let’s start by describing the problem. Imagine you are in the application BANANA. The application is quite complex. It has three modules: BANANA1, BANANA2 and BANANA3. Each one has its exception class ZCX_BANANA1, ZCX_BANANA2 and ZCX_BANANA3. Since the application is in fact well designed, all the exception classes inherit from the same ZCX_BANANA.

When calling a function module which returns exceptions you normally give them sequential numbers like this:

CALL FUNCTION 'GO_BUT_PLEASE_COME_BACK'
  EXPORTING
    ali = 'To the moon'
  EXCEPTIONS
    NOT_FOUND = 1
    GOT_LOST  = 2
    OTHERS    = 3.

But Code Inspector may be configured to report a warning if afterwards you are not careful to add an IF or a CASE to look at SY-SUBRC,