Never do COMMITs inside user-exits. Also, make sure any external routine you call from there doesn’t do any COMMIT either.
Of course you already know the “Model” button in the ABAP editor that allows you to automatically add models for function modules, calls for methods and others.
The new editor has now grown a bit (it’s now only 10 years behind Eclipse instead of 20) and it allows you to automatically complete some commands through the CTRL-SPACE shortcut.
If a development requires more than one customising table consider grouping their maintenance views under a cluster. This way it will be more intuitive to maintain them. This makes even more sense if one depends on the other since in the cluster definition these relations can be explicitly defined.
Example: Como encavalitar tabelas (portuguese)
Always try to select only the fields you’ll need. Selecting others is a waste of resources.
Exception made for the use of FM *_SINGLE_READ because, even though these do select all fields, since they cache the data, they are still faster when used multiple times for the same key.
If you just want to check if a record exists, select just one field, if possible the one you’re using as criteria to avoid declaring an extra variable. Example: SELECT KUNNR INTO V_KUNNR FROM KNA1 WHERE KUNNR = V_KUNNR.
Whenever you feel a constant value can change and you can’t add it as a user parameter, store it in ZCONSTS. This table should never be used directly. Instead, a class like ZCL_CONSTS should be created to properly access it, like shown in this article:
http://abapinho.com/2009/06/constantes/ (portuguese only)
Resist the temptation of using T900 or similar tables for this purpose. It’s true that a lot of people do it. But it’s ugly, durty and besides these tables don’t even have an adequate key because they were not designed with this in mind.
When you touch an object and add it to a transport request, it becomes locked there by default. In a transport request you can also lock objects which are not yet locked in another order. But, once locked, how to unlock them?
Code which is used very often should be made available centrally, if possible under a single package (ex: ZTOOLS) so that it’s easily identified.
- There is a lot of code already available on the Internet to accomplish several common functions (ex: ABAP2XLSX). Adopt it;
- For your most common tasks, develop your own tools which you can reuse and add them to the central library;
- Advertise the existence of that library among your colleagues to avoid that they waste time come up with duplicate code wasting;
- Whenever you develop specific code which you think can one day be reused somewhere else consider making it more generic and add it to the central library.
Sweet little trick: when in SE38 you need to surround a word or expression with () or  or ‘’, just select it and press ( or [ or ‘ and it immediately becomes (it) or [it] or ‘it’.
Thank you Sérgio Fraga for the tip.
If you need to adapt the content of a file with amounts, always take into consideration the user settings (USR01-DSCFM).
If you need to convert a string to a number use FM MOVE_CHAR_TO_NUM.
If you need to convert a number to a string use WRITE curr TO str [CURRENCY waers].
Using SELECT-OPTIONS is one of the very few reasons for using TABLES. For all other cases, explicitly declare a local variable for the equivalent structure. TABLES basically creates obscure global variables which increase ambiguity in the code. And global variables should be avoided anyway.
READ TABLE itbl ASSIGNING
Besides, when making changes to internal tables, not only it doesn’t require the explicit MODIFY but it also does away with the auxiliary TABIX variable.
The only situation in which a working area is better is when adding new lines to an internal table.
Some people contend that working areas should still be used when no changes are to be made to the data. This is still slower, but visually can be more intuitive.
SAP R/3 repository is a wonderful thing. A vast warehouse of data elements, structures, tables and much more, readily available to one and all. As developers, it is extremely convenient to quickly pick these elements and pull them into our programs as necessity conveys, while our string of thought remains virtually uninterrupted.
Well, not all is sunshine and roses. If you are not careful with the mushrooms you pick you might get a poisoned one.
Sometimes you find an IMPORT in the code but you have no idea where the corresponding EXPORT is. When communication is needed between programs, it should be done using a pair of methods belonging to the same class. This way, when we run into one, we’ll always know where the other one is.
Anyway, try to use EXPORT/IMPORT only when unavoidable. If possible, use static class variables instead.
You are looking at a class in SE24, a table in SE11 or a program in SE80. Now you want to see the package of this object and its content. Until recently, I would do this: first I would look in the object’s characteristics to see its package, then open a new session, go to SE80 and write the package there.
Now I’ve learned a much easier way.
When you need to send a dynamic message by parameter, make sure you still use the MESSAGE command, so that the “where-used” doesn’t loose track of it. When you do MESSAGE E001 INTO V_DUMMY, the message details become available in the system variables: SY-MSGNO, SY-MSGTY, etc.
Also, message texts should never be hardcoded, they should always be defined in SE91.
The other day, a series of things crashed in our test machine. All of a sudden, no one could work on it. We found a series of transport requests improperly transported to STMS. The user who appears to be associated with each of these requests is its owner. But is it the owner’s fault? Didn’t someone else do the transport?
How can we find out?
Hi. How’ve you been? How’s life? All cool? This tip is so simple that if we don’t talk for a while it will all end too quickly. The sun is shinning. It rained in the morning but now it stopped.
Every time I see someone still using SE16 I wonder why, since SE16N is so much better and already exists for so long. But this is not the tip.
The tip is that in SE16N you can turn a technical view on which, besides the field’s technical name, gives you more useful information on the field.
You can find it under the “Extras” menu:
Thank you Sérgio Fraga for the tip.
And thank you OZinOH for the photo.
Greetings from Abapinho.
All code to be put in user-exits (BADIs, enhancements, SMOD, etc.) should be encapsulated.
- It’s common for an user-exit to include multiple independent parts. Each of these parts should be encapsulated in its own method. Even if it is only one line;
- This should apply to both new implementations and changes to existing code;
- A change to existing code should always be seen as an opportunity to organize existing code into methods, since it will have to be tested again anyway;
- If a class associated to the respective user-exit still doesn’t exist, one should be created;
- The name of the class should be clearly related to the name of the user-exit. Ex: for user-exit ZXF01U01 uses class Z3F_CL_ZXF01U01.
When you try to delete a package where you have created objects that have meanwhile been deleted, and the package looks empty in SE80, when you try to delete it, it won’t work because it says the package still contains objects.
For some silly reason, SE80 does not show every type of object associated with packages. In addition, when an object is deleted, its entry is often times not deleted correctly. SAP is full of shortcomings. But it’s what we have, and it’s what brings us the bacon, so let’s not say too many bad things about it.
Abapinho has the solution for you.
Official ABAP Programming Guidelines (page 34): [When a classical processing block is required], you should immediately delegate the execution to a suitable method (see Rule 6.37, No Implementations in Function Modules and Subroutines, and Rule 6.44, No Implementations in Dialog Modules and Event Blocks).